RESUMEN
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established minimally invasive method for the diagnosis of benign and malignant conditions. Continuous efforts are underway to improve the material adequacy of EBUS-TBNA, including the introduction of a new technique called EBUS-guided transbronchial nodal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBNC). This method allows for the retrieval of larger and well-preserved histologic samples from the mediastinum. We present a case series of four patients who underwent combined EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TBNC procedures in our centre. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia using a convex probe EBUS scope (Pentax EB-1970UK). Two patients were diagnosed with malignancy and two with benign disorders (silicosis and tuberculosis). In the malignant cases, both EBUS-TBNA/cell block and cryobiopsy provided a diagnosis but cryobiopsy yielded more material for ancillary tests in one patient. However, in the benign cases, there was discordance between EBUS-TBNA/cell block and cryobiopsy. Only cryobiopsy detected granuloma in the patient with TB (tuberculosis), and in the patient with silicosis, TBNC provided a better overall histological evaluation, leading to a definitive diagnosis. No complications were observed. This case series supports the potential diagnostic value of combining EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TBNC, particularly in benign mediastinal lesions (granulomatous diseases), and in cases requiring additional molecular tests in cancer diagnosis.
Exploring a new lymph node biopsy technique: case series from Sabah, MalaysiaWe explored a new technique for lung diagnosis called EBUS-guided transbronchial nodal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBNC). This method helps get larger and well-preserved tissue samples from the chest area. In our study, we used this technique on four patients alongside the established method called EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). All procedures were done with the patient under general anesthesia using a specific type of scope. Two patients were found to have cancer, and two had non-cancerous conditions (silicosis and tuberculosis). In the cancer cases, both methods provided a diagnosis, but the cryobiopsy gave more material for additional tests in one patient. However, in non-cancer cases, there were differences between the two methods. Only the cryobiopsy detected granulomas in the tuberculosis patient, and in the silicosis patient, cryobiopsy gave a better overall tissue evaluation, leading to a clear diagnosis. No complications were seen in any of the cases. This study suggests that combining EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TBNC can be valuable, especially for non-cancerous chest lesions (like granulomatous diseases) and when extra tests are needed for cancer diagnosis.
